Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Answering Questions About Electrical Compliance


With UL requirements and NFPA standards each holding sway over different aspects of electrical compliance, it’s always been tough to figure out whether your cable choices will pass regulatory muster. 

The job of picking compliant cables recently became even tougher. A new version of NFPA 79, the main standard governing the electrical safety of industrial machines, drastically changes the compliance picture. To read more about the changes and how they’ll affect your cable selection practices, download our new technical paper on NFPA 79 compliance. 

And check out the following answers to your most commonly asked compliance questions:
  • Is NFPA 79 a law? No. NFPA–79 is the key electrical safety standard accepted by machine builders, installers and buyers in the United States.

  • Does a machine have to comply with NFPA 79? In most cases, yes. The need for NFPA compliance ultimately depends on the application details and whether the machine is being installed in a building. When in doubt, it’s a good idea to comply with NFPA 79 to maximize safety and avoid the potential for litigation

  • Will machine builders and buyers standardize on the new edition of NFPA 79? Yes. Concerns about safety and liability issues will force compliance with the new 2012 edition of the NFPA standard. Buyers of industrial equipment are unlikely to purchase non-compliant machines that could increase the potential for litigation.

  • Who decides which cables can be installed in the field? Engineers may assume that UL dictates cable choice, but the authority falls with electrical inspectors who determine compliance with the National Electrical Code. UL, however, does control the electrical, physical and environmental testing requirements and approvals that, in practice, determine cable usage in the field.

  • Are UL listed cables always allowable for use on a machine? Not necessarily. There are machines that use UL listed cordage incorrectly. For example, some listed cables are only intended for temporary applications. Other listed cables may not meet the minimum stranding requirements needed for NFPA 79 compliance.

  • What’s special about MTW approval? Machine Tool Wire (MTW) approval requires that the cable be flexible and offer a high degree of mechanical durability. These characteristics allow it to perform under the challenging conditions surrounding industrial machines.

  • Are all MTW cables oil resistant? Yes, all compliant MTW cables minimally meet the requirements of the UL Oil Res I test. For applications requiring a more severe exposure, the more rigorous Oil Res II test is also a permitted option.

  • Can I run MTW cable into building infrastructure? No, not unless it is dual marked with the appropriate UL Listing. Cables marked with “FT4” offer the high flammability rating needed for installation in building infrastructure. The MTW requirements alone mandate that a cable only meet a minimal flame test known as VW–1.

  • Can cables be left exposed when going from the machine to the cable tray? In most cases, no. Cables designed for exposed runs must have a “TC-ER” approval.




Visit our website 

Like us on Facebook

Join our Linkedin Network

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

VFD Cable For Reliable Precision Control


Nowadays, variable frequency drives often serve in mission-critical process control applications, and when they go down, they can bring production lines to a standstill.  Our engineers have recently taken steps to eliminate an oft-overlooked weak link in drive reliability.
They have developed a new cable that creates extremely robust power connections between VFDs and motors. Called ÖLFLEX® VFD XL, this shielded motor cable offers mechanical and electrical properties beyond those offered by standard AWG motor cables. Among the improvements: 

• Rugged PVC Jacketing Withstands Harsh Conditions. ÖLFLEX® VFD XL has been designed to perform in harsh conditions. It meets UL Oil Resistance I and II standards. It also thrives in low temperatures and has passed UL -25ºC Cold Impact and -40ºC Cold Bend tests. Maximum continuous use temperature is 90ºC. 

• Global Stranding Lowers DC Resistance. Thanks to its Class 5 conductor stranding, which meets both European and North American standards, ÖLFLEX® VFD XL has a 14% or larger CMA than a comparable AWG cable. The larger CMA contributes to a low DC resistance, making ÖLFLEX® VFD XL well-suited to long cable runs.

• XLPE Improves Electrical Properties.  ÖLFLEX® VFD XL uses a cross-linked polyethylene insulation, which enhances electrical properties that provides a lower dielectric constant to improve the purity of the signal.  Due to the thicker cross linked polyethylene insulation wall thickness cable design allows the cable to withstand voltage spikes, inrush currents and other electrical disruptions that damage motor cables. 

Shielding Resists Noise.  With its combination of triple-laminate foil tape and 85% braid coverage, ÖLFLEX® VFD XL offers enhanced shield effectiveness that eliminates external noise problems and internal signal disruptions.


ÖLFLEX® VFD XL has UL and CSA TC approvals. Recommended applications include VFD drive and motor connections for web presses, HVAC systems, conveyors and many other types of industrial machines.


Need more information or detailed technical specifications? click here  



Visit our website 

Like us on Facebook

Join our Linkedin Network

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

The Importance of Oil Resistant Cables in Industrial Applications


Introduction

The demands of the industrial environment are ongoing, with ever changing trends. Cables, which were once able to sustain functional and operational integrity a decade ago, would not be adequate to survive in the environment of a present day manufacturing site. Everywhere, from the Renewable Energy Industry, Automotive Assembly Plants, to the factories that manufactures small office machines and even in some commercial buildings, the oil resistance of cables has become increasingly important. Oils serve a dual-purpose role in industrial applications, both as a coolant and lubricant, depending upon the requirements mandated by the end use application. Sustaining trouble free cable operation under harsh chemical and environmental conditions reduces costly manufacturing down time and helps to eliminate or minimize periodic maintenance and costly cable replacement. All of these factors mentioned play a major role that is critical to a consistent, smoothly run manufacturing operation, which in the end, results in higher profit margins.


Regulatory and Code Changes

With the changes to the National Electrical Code (NEC) in the past 10 years, protective conduit or raceway is no longer required when running an exposed run (-ER) cable from the tray to the equipment or device. Previously, when the cable was extended from tray to machine, conduit or raceway was used primarily as a protection mechanism in helping to prevent cable damage. Originally TC-ER cable (previously printed “open wiring”) had a length limitation of 50 ft. from the tray to the equipment. The 50 Ft. allowances resolved a large “grey” area in the industrial environment and was initially a well-received solution by the industry. Due to the overwhelming acceptance of the 50 ft. length allowance, the NEC committee enacted further changes shortly thereafter, permitting unlimited length of TC-ER under Article 336. With the advent of unlimited length, Article 336 also brought other issues, like a greater area of cable exposure and susceptibility to the surrounding industrial environment. Under the typical conditions of operation, consideration for factors such as ambient temperature, a cables mechanical strength, unintended movement and constant exposure to industrial lubricating and coolant oils must be taken into account. When exposed to these conditions, the cable inevitably will begin to deteriorate; the overall jacket may swell and/or crack, creating a potentially hazardous condition, along with machine and production down time. These possible problems are undesirable and necessitate the need to implement cable protection measures. When referring to NFPA 79, the electrical standard for industrial machinery, Machine Tool Wire (MTW) is one type of cable permitted. Under the standard for machine tool wire, UL 1063, passing the Oil Res I test is required and further severe testing such as the Oil Res II is optional. Environmental resistance tests, such as those per UL Standards were implemented in response to the globalization of industry with the goal of standardizing the oil resistance requirements of cables used in manufacturing industrial machinery throughout the world.


Purpose and Application

Why does oil cause such excessive damage on certain types of insulations and jackets and how does this occur? All compounds are not the same, for example, certain types of PVC have a higher degree of flame resistance, while others have better oil resistance, and some demonstrate improved flexibility characteristics. PVC formulations vary greatly, depending on the desired properties and applications.

These properties can be achieved by adjusting the formulations of a particular PVC compound. The modification or addition of flame-retardants (iodine), stabilizers, and fillers allow the compound to exhibit these types of enhanced characteristics. However, when certain PVC characteristics are improved, the enhancement sometimes comes at a cost, the cost being that other performance traits are affected or completely lost.

The specific application will determine if oil is used as a lubricant and/or coolant. Acting as a lubricant, oil would be applied to a gear system driven by motors to prevent premature wear down and insure smooth operation. Acting as a coolant, oil is applied during the machine lathing process to keep metal from becoming too hot. In the field, cables can be exposed to oil in a Wind Turbine nacelle, (the nacelle is the area located on the top of the turbine) where oil is used in the gearbox. Cables that lay in the floor of the nacelle are subjected to oil that is unavoidably spilled. These cables are then exposed to oil for very long periods of time, along with other extreme high and low temperatures causing the lower quality jacket compounds of a cable to crack. There are many factors involved regarding how oil will attack wire and cable, such as, exposure, ambient temperature and also possible continued immersion. In general, increases in the amount of exposure, the frequency and the ambient temperature, the faster oil will start the deterioration process. In short, oil attacks the insulating compound, where it will become virtually ineffective in its primary role as an effective insulator. This action can create a possibly very hazardous situation, not only to human life, but also to the overall function of the industrial machinery to which it is connected. This results in very expensive downtime, costly repair and in the worst-case scenario, entire replacement of the machine.


Step 1: When process oils come in contact with PVC & Polyolefin compounds, the process oils are attracted to the plasticizers in the cable.

Step 2: The oils can be absorbed by a Polyolefin material resulting in swelling and weakening of the cable jacket.

Step 3: The oils can extract the plasticizers from PVC materials making the cable jacket hard and lead to failures.


What Happens

All wire and cable insulations are not created equal. Electrical, environmental, mechanical, and chemical attributes will vary depending upon the individual compound formulations. Insulating compounds contain a specific amount of plasticizers in their individual formulations, which help promote flexibility and resistance to fatigue. When compounds are exposed to lubricating and coolant processing oils the material either absorbs the oil or the plasticizer will diffuse from the compound.

When oil is absorbed, it causes severe swelling and softening of the compound resulting in degradation of tensile properties. When the oil causes diffusion of the compound plasticizer, hardening will result and all flexibility and elongation properties are lost. The attached pictures will illustrate the effects that oil can inflict on cable jackets and insulation:


Cracking – Caused during exposure of the PVC to oil or other chemicals due the complete removal of plasticizers, resulting in hardening and eventual cracking of the insulation and jacket.






 
Melting – Caused during exposure of the PVC to oil or other chemicals due to the absorption and combination with the plasticizer, resulting in softening and the high elasticity noted in the compound.




Swelling – Caused during exposure of the PVC to oil or other chemicals due to migration of the oils into the plasticizer, resulting in noticeable increases in insulation
and jacket diameter.

 




Discoloring – Caused during the exposure of the PVC to oil or other chemicals due to the diffusion of the plasticizers along with colorant from the insulation and jacket.




The preceding pictures verify the damage caused by oil exposure is irreversible and creates hazardous conditions. Now, in addition to cable replacement costs, there is also the expense of reinstallation to be taken into account. To avoid these types of unwanted scenarios, the customer must review the properties of the cables they are about to consider for their application and determine suitability for the oil environment. There are UL tests, which help determine how a cable will react in the industrial oil environment. These tests are more commonly referred to as the Oil Res I and Oil Res II tests, which involve continuous immersion of the cable samples in IRM 902 at elevated temperatures for a specified period of time. Passing results are determined by the evaluation of mechanical properties and observations of physical damage caused by the oil exposure. In 2000, Lapp as an innovator and leader, approached UL about creating tougher standards which resulted in the creation of AWM style 21098.The table below indicates the industry standard tests that are used to evaluate wire and cable oil exposure performance:

Industry Oil Exposure Tests




Example of Tensile and Elongation Test Methods

Let us assume, for example, that the cable jacket of your product is going to be tested for compliance to UL Oil Res II. Tensile and Elongation tests must be performed both on the original (unaged) and oil immersed (aged) test samples and must be prepared as defined under UL Standard 2556. Die cut dumbbell specimens are taken from the jacket and are then tested for tensile strength and elongation.

As for sample preparation, two marks are applied approximately 1.3 inches apart from each other and equidistant from the center of the dumbbell sample. (See diagram on next page). These marks are applied at right angles to the direction of the pull in the testing apparatus. The sample is then clamped on the tester with one-inch marks outside of and between the grips. The grips are then separated at the rate of 20 inches per minute until the sample breaks. Results are then recorded for elongation and pound force breakage; tensile strength is calculated by dividing the pound force by the cross sectional area of the specimen.

Die-Cut Specimen



Untested die cut samples are aged under the UL Oil Res II requirement of 75°C for 60 days. After 60 days, the samples are removed from the oil for a minimum of 16 hours. They are then tested for tensile and elongation, which must retain 65% of the unaged values. The following is an example for an Oil Res II test results:





Conclusion

The oil resistance of cables has now become a critical performance parameter when electrical contractors, engineers, and installers specify cables for end use application designs. The continued growing popularity of oil resistance requirements is due to changes in standard regulations and the increased performance characteristics that are mandated by certain industries: Renewable Energy, Automotive Assembly Plants and other production facilities. As time moves forward, superior oil resistant cables will become standard, rather than the exception and the demand for this type of operating performance will only continue to grow. 




Visit our website 

Like us on Facebook

Join our Linkedin Network

Selecting Cables for VFD Applications


For all their energy savings and process control benefits, variable frequency drive (VFD) systems have a downside too. When these drives fail, they can bring motor-driven industrial processes to a dead stop. To avoid this costly downtime, smart engineers carefully evaluate reliability when configuring a drive system.

All too often, however, the reliability analysis focuses solely on the VFD power electronics and neglects the most vulnerable component in the drive system–the power cable that connects the VFD to the motor.

The truth is, however, that power electronics have already become very reliable over the years. By design, they can handle the typical voltage spikes, inrush currents, harmonics and other power distortions that arise during VFD operation. Their controls can also prevent damaging electrical conditions or shut down the drive if power distortions rise to unsafe levels. 

Cables do not have any such protection and can fail if subjected to electrical conditions that generate more heat or voltage levels than the cable’s insulating layers can tolerate. Cables in industrial settings may also experience mechanical loads and chemical exposures that lead to damage and premature failure.

Fortunately, it is possible to avoid VFD-related cable failures and the associated downtime by paying attention to a few cable construction details.


Materials. Not all insulation and jacketing materials are created equal when it comes to electrical performance. So it’s important to match cable materials to specific VFD application requirements. To take three examples:

  • High Potential For Electrical Damage.  As the likelihood of  damage from voltage spikes or other power distortions increases, consider VFD cables that make use of semiconductive layers between the conductors and the primary insulation.  These semiconductive insulation systems have for decades been employed in high voltage cables. More recently, they have been applied to VFD cables to protect against electrical damage.
  • Overload Conditions In Long Cable Runs. When the installations require long cable runs, the risk of capacitance loads triggering the VFD overcurrent protection system rises too. The use of cables with the right insulation system can minimize this risk. Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) insulation, for example, has a relatively low dielectric constant that reduces the capacitive effect in long cables. XLPE also has excellent thermo-mechanical properties that allow the XLPE insulation with withstand the heat generated by overcurrent conditions.

  • Precision Control.  It may not be obvious, but insulation choices can influence the control response of VFD systems. For applications requiring precision control, an approprieate insulation system will minimize transfer impedance and improve the velocity of propagation to produce a more efficient control response. 
              
Mechanical Properties. With VFDs typically installed in factory environments, cables should be engineered to withstand mechanical abuse and environmental exposures. Some of the key mechanical attributes in VFD installations include:

  • Flexibility. Enhanced flexibility pays off throughout the cable’s life cycle. During installation, flexibility makes handling and routing easier. In use, flexible cables are less susceptible to damage from bending. 

  • Oil Resistance. For industrial applications where oil exposure is a concern, make sure that prospective VFD cables comply with UL Oil Resistance requirements.

  • Crush Tested. Consider whether cables have the crush resistance needed for the installation. Cables certified as TC-ER, for both tray and exposed run installation, have to pass rigorous mechanical tests for cable crush and impact resistance, including UL Standard 1569. Because these rugged cables need no conduit, they can drive down installation cost and time significantly.

Stranding. To minimize voltage drop and maximize efficiency, consider the cable’s circular mil area (CMA). Cables whose conductors have a large CMA have lower DC resistance than cables with a smaller CMA. Low DC resistance, in turn, translates to significantly lowers voltage drop across a given length of wire.    




Visit our website 

Like us on Facebook

Join our Linkedin Network

Understand Connector Selection to Avoid Downtime


A typical manufacturing plant today will have thousands, or even many thousands, of electrical connections on both fixed equipment and moving machines. And it’s just a matter of time before some of those connections fail or wear out, bringing production machines to a dead stop. One way to minimize this downtime is to “connectorize” power and signal cables.

Multi-conductor cables can often be replaced in just minutes if they have connectors at both ends. Hard-wiring that same cable could take hours.

Connectors Prevent Downtime.  Power and signal disruptions have many mechanical and electrical causes, everything from forklift accidents to over-current conditions. With all the mission-critical electrical connections in a modern plant, downtime from damaged electrical connections is a matter of “when” not  “if.”

Think of connectors as a low-cost insurance policy against this downtime. While connectors do add a small premium to the initial cost of cabling, they will pay for themselves many times over if they eliminate even a few minutes of downtime on a busy production line.

Connector Selection Made Easy. For all their downtime-prevention benefits, there is one problem with connectors. Call it “connector confusion.” 

There are currently dozens of connector varieties and thousands of individual connectors on the market, and even experienced engineers can find it difficult to select the right connector for the job at hand.

Fortunately, connector confusion can be minimized by gathering information on five key technical factors. This information is readily available to any engineer who has already sized the application’s power or signal cables:

  • Number of contacts.
  • Wire gauge (AWG).
  • Cable outside diameter.
  • Maximum voltage.
  • Maximum current.

Taken together, these factors determine whether the connector will function as a true extension of a given cable. It’s important to emphasize that all five factors must be taken into consideration. A connector, for instance, may meet the requirements on number of contacts, wire gauge and outside diameter but not satisfy the application’s current or voltage requirements.

The five key connector factors should be thought of as a starting point. They don’t capture the effects of difficult operating environments or unusual electrical requirements. But they will help you quickly narrow down the otherwise overwhelming field of connector products.




Visit our website 

Like us on Facebook

Join our Linkedin Network