Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Wind Turbine Standards and Recent Changes



WIND INDUSTRY STANDARDS

There are many wind industry codes in place to ensure the proper installation and safe operation of Wind Turbines:



UL Subject 6141 – Large Wind Turbine Systems.
These requirements cover large wind turbine systems (WT) and electrical subassemblies. With respect to this standard, large WT are wind turbines where a user or service person may, or is intended to, enter the turbine to operate it or perform maintenance. These WT are for use in utility-interactive, grid-tied applications that operate in parallel with an electric power system (EPS) to supply power to common or stand-alone loads. This standard includes requirements for WT intended for EPS grid connections at transmission, sub-transmission and distribution levels, depending on the specifications of the specific WT.

UL Subject 6142 – Wind Turbine Generating Systems, Small.
These requirements cover small wind turbine systems (WT) and electrical subassemblies. With respect to this standard, small WT are wind turbines where a user or service person is not intended or required to enter the turbine to operate or to perform maintenance. These units are for use in stand-alone (not grid-connected) or utility-interactive applications. Utility-interactive, grid-tied WT are operated in parallel with an electric power system (EPS) to supply power to common loads.


UL Subject 2277 – Outline of Investigation for Flexible Motor Supply Cable and Wind Turbine Tray Cable.
This outline covers the requirements for Wind Turbine Tray Cable (WTTC) rated 1000 volts, 90 to 200°C dry and optionally rated 90°C wet. It also covers the requirements for Flexible Motor Supply Cable rated 1000 or 2000 volts and 90°C dry.


UL 1004–1 - Standard for Rotating Electrical Machines – General Requirements.
This Standard applies to rotating electrical machines and linear motors both ac and dc, rated 7,200 volts or less and is used to evaluate both motors intended for field and factory installation. The requirements of this Standard that address the risk of fire do not apply to a motor provided with a metal enclosure where there are no openings in the enclosure through which molten metal, burning insulation, flaming particles or other ignited material could fall onto flammable material, or through which a flame could be projected.


UL 1004–4 – Standard for Electric Generators.
This Standard is intended to be read together with the general requirements of UL 1004–1. The requirements in this Standard supplement or amend the requirements in UL 1004–1. The requirements of UL 1004–1 apply unless modified by this Standard. This Standard covers electric generators, that, when coupled with prime movers, such as engines or electric motors, are used to produce electricity. Both generators (dc machines) and alternators (ac machines) rated 7,200 volts or less, are covered.


CSA C61400–1–08 - Wind Turbines - Part 1: Design Requirements.
This part of IEC 61400 specifies essential design requirements to ensure the engineering integrity of wind turbines. Its purpose is to provide an appropriate level of protection against damage from all hazards during the planned lifetime. This standard is concerned with all subsystems of wind turbines such as control and protection mechanisms, internal electrical systems, mechanical systems and support structures. This standard applies to wind turbines of all sizes. For small wind turbines, IEC 61400–2 may be applied.





RECENT INDUSTRY CODES CHANGES IN NORTH AMERICA

As the use of wind turbines in industry and commercial applications becomes more prevalent, there is a growing need to ensure their proper installation and safe operation, which has prompted mandates to provide clearly written safety standards. While utility companies are monitored by government agencies, non-utility applications are guided by the National Electrical Code (NEC). In 2011, a new section called Article 694 was added to the NEC to ensure installation safety of small wind electric systems. NEC Article 694 covers small wind power single turbines that are rated for 100 Kilowatts (0.1KW). There is no limit to the number of wind turbines that can be installed in a given location. When several of these machines populate the same location, it is referred to as a “wind turbine farm” which can cover an area of several hundred square miles.

To establish consistency and to prevent confusion, UL has drafted several subjects corresponding to wind turbine generating systems: UL Subject 6141: Large Wind Turbine Systems (WT) and Electrical Subassemblies, and UL Subject 6142: Small Wind Turbine Systems (WT) and Electrical Subassemblies. Wind turbines with entrance access are defined as “large” per UL 6141. They are grid-connected and are used for “utility” applications. Wind turbines without entrance access are defined as “small” per UL 6142. They are not connected to the grid and are considered “non-utility.” As the industry grows and the emphasis towards revision of standards continues, UL 6141 and 6142 will be upgraded to include new requirements.

In addition, there are corresponding UL Standards that focus on specific internal components within the wind turbine. For example, Rotating Electrical Machines must meet UL Standard 1004–1. Electric Generators have to meet UL Standard 1004–4, and so forth. In UL Standard 1004–1 AWM, cables are permitted, but only with exceptions. Section 20.2 allows the use of either standard building wire or appliance wiring material (AWM). Section 20.4 permits AWM, provided it has an insulation thickness appropriate for the insulation material type and meets stringent cable construction requirements. As UL Standard 1004–1 allows for the AWM option, building wire is a “listed” product, automatically qualifying it as an NEC compliant wiring method. It’s worth noting, however, that AWM is not an NEC
acceptable wiring method, so it may be subject to potential acceptance issues during an inspection.


Within the construction of the wind turbine, cable trays or raceways route and support cables to accommodate power for the various operating systems. To address safety concerns about performance of these cables under operating conditions inside the wind turbine, UL released an outline of investigation for “Flexible Motor Supply Cable and Wind Turbine Tray Cable.” This Outline, referred to as UL 2277, permits a 1,000 Volt rating and specifies safety and performance requirements for cable intended to be installed within a tray or raceway in the wind turbine. UL 2277 mandates that cables used in a cable tray or raceway in the wind turbine must also meet all performance criteria of UL 1277, known as the “Tray Cable” standard.




Download the full version Whitepaper

 



Cable Designs to Meet Wind Turbine Industry Standards



Cable Designs to Meet Wind Turbine Industry Standards

Over the last several decades, wind turbine installations have dramatically increased. As their use has become more widespread, they have evolved in both efficiency and complexity. Today’s wind turbines are comprised of a vast array
of sophisticated components that are subject to damage from the harsh environments in which they operate. Among the most critical and overlooked components in turbine systems are the cables that handle the power and data transmission.

Because they can fail when exposed to the temperature extremes, chemicals and electromagnetic interference (EMI) found on wind turbines, cables for the wind energy applications must be selected very carefully. They must also be tested rigorously to make sure they meet industry standards.

Here’s an update on the current state of standards for wind turbines in North America, as well as a more in-depth look at the factors design engineers should consider when selecting cabling for wind turbine applications.



INDUSTRY CODE CHANGES IN NORTH AMERICA


As the use of wind turbines in industry and commercial applications becomes more prevalent, there is a growing need to ensure their proper installation and safe operation, which has prompted mandates to provide clearly written safety standards. While utility companies are monitored by government agencies, non-utility applications are guided by the National Electrical Code (NEC). In 2011, a new section called Article 694 was added to the NEC to ensure installation safety of small wind electric systems. NEC Article 694 covers small wind power single turbines that are rated for 100 Kilowatts (0.1KW). There is no limit to the number of wind turbines that can be installed in a given location. When several of these machines populate the same location, it is referred to as a “wind turbine farm” which can cover an area of several hundred square miles.

To establish consistency and to prevent confusion, UL has drafted several subjects corresponding to wind turbine generating systems: UL Subject 6141: Large Wind Turbine Systems (WT) and Electrical Subassemblies, and UL Subject 6142: Small Wind Turbine Systems (WT) and Electrical Subassemblies. Wind turbines with entrance access are defined as “large” per UL 6141. They are grid-connected and are used for “utility” applications. Wind turbines without entrance access are defined as “small” per UL 6142. They are not connected to the grid and are considered “non-utility.” As the industry grows and the emphasis towards revision of standards continues, UL 6141 and 6142 will be upgraded to include new requirements.

In addition, there are corresponding UL Standards that focus on specific internal components within the wind turbine. For example, Rotating Electrical Machines must meet UL Standard 1004–1. Electric Generators have to meet UL Standard 1004–4, and so forth. In UL Standard 1004–1 AWM, cables are permitted, but only with exceptions. Section 20.2 allows the use of either standard building wire or appliance wiring material (AWM). Section 20.4 permits AWM, provided it has an insulation thickness appropriate for the insulation material type and meets stringent cable construction requirements. As UL Standard 1004–1 allows for the AWM option, building wire is a “listed” product, automatically qualifying it as an NEC compliant wiring method. It’s worth noting, however, that AWM is not an NEC
acceptable wiring method, so it may be subject to potential acceptance issues during an inspection.


Within the construction of the wind turbine, cable trays or raceways route and support cables to accommodate power for the various operating systems. To address safety concerns about performance of these cables under operating conditions inside the wind turbine, UL released an outline of investigation for “Flexible Motor Supply Cable and Wind Turbine Tray Cable.” This Outline, referred to as UL 2277, permits a 1,000 Volt rating and specifies safety and performance requirements for cable intended to be installed within a tray or raceway in the wind turbine. UL 2277 mandates that cables used in a cable tray or raceway in the wind turbine must also meet all performance criteria of UL 1277, known as the “Tray Cable” standard.








Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Coping with Electrical Safety Standards - A Real Life Success Story

If you find electrical safety standards confusing, you’re not alone. Many machine builders have recently had to grapple with an ambiguous round of changes to NFPA-79, the portion of the National Electrical Code that governs the electrical wiring of industrial machines. The standard cuts a broad swath across the industrial machinery landscape. It applies to a comprehensive range of machine types—everything from machine tools and injection molding presses to testing machines and packaging lines.

It encompasses all of a machine’s electrical and electronic elements operating at 600 volts or less. The vast majority of machine power, control and lighting circuits fall under the scope of NFPA-79.
Machine builders have worked under the dictates of NFPA-79 for years, but earlier this year the standard underwent revisions that make it far more difficult to specify compliant electrical cabling.

Here’s a look at those revisions and how to design around them:

Appliance Wire Now Permitted – With Restrictions
The key change to NFPA-79 for 2012 involves the ability to use Appliance Wiring Material (AWM), which had been banned since 2007. AWM can be a cost-effective wiring choice compared to higher-performing UL listed Machine Tool Wire (MTW). But there were a couple of sound reasons behind the AWM ban. For one, some contractors had been using AWM incorrectly as part of the building infrastructure. And the National Electrical code does not recognize AWM for this type of use. For another, not all AWM products are created equal when it comes to the quality of their insulation layer. In cases of low quality commodity cabling, insulation thickness variations had resulted in wire that was not sufficiently flame resistant for use in industrial machines.

It’s important to stress that not all AWM suffers from this quality issue. Lapp and other reputable cable manufacturers can and do produce AWM products whose insulation wall thickness is both consistent and adequate for the voltage rating of the cable. High quality AWM can pass necessary vertical flame tests (FT 1) and can safely be used in industrial machines. Keep in mind, however, that AWM lacks the extra layers of PVC-nylon insulation found in MTW. This extra insulation allows some types of MTW to pass more rigorous flame tests (FT 4) than even the best AWM.
Reversing the AWM ban reflected the realities of the global machinery marketplace, in which AWM remains a popular
cabling choice. In contrast to MTW cable, however, the permission to use AWM is not a given. Instead, the NFPA
standard imposes restrictions intended to overcoming the potential drawbacks of AWM. The first of these restrictions is the AWM must be identified as suitable for the application at hand and must be used in accordance with the machine manufacturer’s instructions. The restrictions also detail cable construction details including minimum conductor count, flame resistance and wall thickness. Compliant AWM cable must be labeled appropriately with
a jacket print legend that spells out the AWM style number, voltage, temperature rating and flame rating.
The reversal on AWM usage also resulted in increased documentation requirements. For example, field installation
information related to the AWM wire must be provided with each machine’s technical documentation.


For Easy Compliance, Go With Machine Tool Wire

Given all the cable runs on and around today’s complex industrial machines, the need to document AWM usage for
each and every machine represents the most onerous of all the NFPA restrictions. In the case of extremely large machines, such as bottling lines, machine builders and installation contractors have in some cases spend dozens of engineering hours and thousands of dollars complying with the documentation requirements (see sidebar).
These documentation requirements, while not insurmountable, need to be factored into the cost of wiring the machine. In some cases, the documentation may even erode the minor price advantages of some AWM cables.

If the documentation requirements cause concern, one way around them is to favor listed MTW. Because it inherently
complies with NFPA-79, MTW cabling can alleviate the documentation requirements and eliminate any residual
confusion over whether a given AWM product is approved and properly labeled. MTW also has a host of technical advantages that derive from its superior flexibility and resistance to flame, oil, chemicals and mechanical stresses.
Some MTW products also carry a UL TC listing and may even be rated for Exposed Run usage. These broadly-certified MTW
cables adapt to the widest range of application requirements, and they can slash installation costs when used in exposed runs (see sidebar). There’s are times, however, when AWM may be the best valid choice, MTW’s technical edge notwithstanding. In overseas markets, for example, AWM may win out for supply chain reasons.
If you do go with AWM, make sure you buy only the high quality product designed to withstand all abuse of an industrial environment. And buy from reputable suppliers who can help you comply with the complex labeling, documentation and application hurdles imposed by NFPA-79.


Krones Puts in the Time for NFPA Compliance

One company that has successfully navigated the shoals of the recent NFPA-79 is Krones Inc., a leading manufacturer and integrator of packaging lines for some of the world’s best known food and beverage companies. The company’s engineering team recently found that compliant AWM usage does require a bit of extra effort compared to the automatic compliance found with listed UL wire.

“Whenever you have to implement changes to an electrical code, there’s definitely an engineering labor factor,” says
Mike Nelson, the Krones engineer charged with NFPA-79 compliance. Some of that engineering labor has gone into researching into specific AWM products to see whether they meet the compliance restrictions. Even proper jacket labeling doesn’t answer all the compliance questions regarding AWM, “so you can’t tell whether a product complies just by looking at the cable,” says Nelson. More engineering labor has been devoted to NFPA-79’s documentation requirements.

In all, Nelson estimates that Krones has spent more than 150 engineering man hours complying with the requirements related to AWM use. And that figure represents just work done to formulate a compliance strategy. It does not include the technical documentation and drawing changes needed for each and every machine.


Exposed Cable Runs for Fast Installation

Another change in the 2012 NFPA-79 allows exposed cable runs along the structure of the equipment or in the machine chassis. As long as the exposed cables have to closely follow the surface and structural members of the machine, the installation does not require conduit, raceways or any special hardware. Thanks to reductions in installation time and labor, exposed cable runs can dramatically reduce cost dramatically compared to traditional installation methods requiring conduit or special mounting hardware.

Certain UL Listed cables meet Exposed Run (-ER) requirements, which provide an additional level of protection
for these types of applications. Cables meeting –ER requirements are subjected to the same crush and impact
tests as armored type or Metal Clad (MC) cables, allowing cables to leave the machine area and enter into a cable tray without conduit. Keep in mind, though, that not all UL Listed cables meet NFPA requirements, especially the lower-priced commodity and rigid products.


Common Electrical Compliance Questions

With UL requirements and NFPA standards each holding sway over different aspects of electrical compliance, it’s
always been tough to figure out whether your cable choices will pass regulatory muster.
The job of picking compliant cables recently became even tougher. A new version of NFPA 79, the main standard
governing the electrical safety of industrial machines, drastically changes the compliance picture. To read more
about the changes and how they’ll affect your cable selection practices, download our new technical paper on
NFPA 79 compliance. And check out the following answers to your most commonly asked compliance questions:

• Is NFPA 79 a law?
No. NFPA–79 is the key electrical safety standard accepted by machine builders, installers and buyers in the United States.

• Does a machine have to comply with NFPA 79?
In most cases, yes. The need for NFPA compliance ultimately depends on the application details and whether the machine is being installed in a building. When in doubt, it’s a good idea to comply with NFPA 79 to maximize safety and avoid the potential for litigation.

• Will machine builders and buyers standardize on the new edition of NFPA 79?
Yes. Concerns about safety and liability issues will force compliance with the new 2012 edition of the NFPA standard. Buyers of industrial equipment are unlikely to purchase non-compliant machines that could increase the potential for litigation.

• Who decides which cables can be installed in the field?
Engineers may assume that UL dictates cable choice, but the real authority falls with electrical inspectors who determine compliance with the National Electrical Code. UL, however, does control the electrical, physical and environmental testing requirements and approvals that, in practice, determine cable usage in the field.

• Are UL listed cables always allowable for use on a machine?
Not necessarily. There are machines that use UL listed cordage incorrectly. For example, some listed cables are only intended for temporary applications. Other listed cables may not meet the minimum stranding requirements needed for NFPA 79 compliance.

• What’s special about MTW approval?
Machine Tool Wire (MTW) approval requires that the cable be flexible and offer a high degree of mechanical durability. These characteristics allow it to perform under the challenging conditions surrounding industrial machines.

• Are all MTW cables oil resistant?
Yes, all compliant MTW cables minimally meet the requirements of the UL Oil Res I test. For applications requiring a more severe exposure, the more rigorous Oil Res II test is also a permitted option.

• Can I run MTW cable into building infrastructure?
No, not unless it is dual marked with the appropriate UL Listing. Cables marked “TC” offer the high flammability rating needed for installation in building infrastructure. The MTW requirements alone mandate that a cable only meet a minimal flame test known as VW–1.

• Can cables be left exposed when going from the machine to the cable tray?
In most cases, no. Cables designed for exposed runs must have a “TC-ER” approval.