Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Cable Glands for Full EMI Protection


Winning the war against electromagnetic interference (EMI) on today’s factory floors requires attention to detail. One of those details involves the ability of cable glands to contribute to a reliable grounding system.
Left unprotected, cable glands transmit electrical noise that can wreak havoc on motor-driven industrial processes. Many types of cable glands feature shielding to keep EMI at bay, yet the effectiveness of that shielding  can vary widely from product to product.
The ease of installation can vary as well. Some sheilding options have difficult termination methods or grounding conntections that can drive up labor cost and time.  
With SKINTOP® MS-M Brush, our engineers have addressed both the shielding and installation issues. As its name suggests, this cable gland features a brush-type grounding connection that:
  Enhances EMI control. Unlike other connection methods, such as the grounding clamps commonly used on drive systems, the brush provides continuous 360° contact around the cable’s screen braid. This continuous contact protects against EMI by lowering the resistance of current ground path and providing a low impedance connection between the cable shield and the housing.
  Eases Installation. Making an EMI-free connection between cable and the SKINTOP cable gland is simple. Installers simply insert the cable, push the screen braid into the brush and tighten the cable gland assembly. Other grounding methods require far more effort to make the termination. Earth sleeves, for example, can serve as an effective grounding method, but their termination process requires precision measurments and exacting preparation of the stripped area.
In addition to its innovative brush-type connection, SKINTOP® MS-M Brush offers IP 68 protection and resists temperatures up to 100ÂșC. Until recently, it was available only in metric sizes, ranging from M–25X1.5 to M–110X2.0. This month, we’ve introduced NPT sizes from ¾” to 2”.
For detailed technical information on SKINTOP® MS-M Brush, go to http://www.lappusa.com/PDF/Page506-SkintopMSMBrush-BrushPlus.pdf

Monday, August 13, 2012

Krones Puts in the Time for NFPA Compliance

If you find electrical safety standards confusing, you’re not alone. Many machine builders have recently had to grapple with an ambiguous round of changes to NFPA–79, the portion of the National Electrical Code that governs the electrical wiring of industrial machines.

The most important change to NFPA–79 for 2012 involves the ability to use Appliance Wiring Material (AWM), which had been banned since 2007.

AWM can be a cost-effective wiring choice compared to higher-performing UL listed Machine Tool Wire (MTW). And though there had been some [sound technical reasons behind the ban](link to white paper download), high-quality AWM can be a valid wiring choice if properly specified.

One company that has successfully navigated the shoals of the changes related to AWM usage is Krones Inc., a manufacturer and integrator of packaging lines for some of the world’s best known food and beverage companies.

Krones’ engineering team recently found that compliant AWM usage does require a bit of extra effort compared to the automatic compliance found with listed UL wire. “Whenever you have to implement changes to an electrical code, there’s definitely an engineering labor factor,” says Mike Nelson, the Krones engineer charged with NFPA–79 compliance.

Some of that engineering labor has gone into researching into specific AWM products to see whether they meet the compliance restrictions. Even proper jacket labeling doesn’t answer all the compliance questions regarding AWM, “so you can’t tell whether a product complies just by looking at the cable,” says Nelson. More engineering labor has been devoted to NFPA–79’s documentation requirements.

In all, Nelson estimates that Krones has spent more than 150 engineering man hours complying with the requirements related to AWM use. And that figure represents just work done to formulate a compliance strategy. It does not include the technical documentation and drawing changes needed for each and every machine.

For more information about NFPA-79 compliance, download our latest white paper. Or contact the experts one our application engineering team for compliance help.




Visit our website 

Like us on Facebook

Join our Linkedin Network

Industrial Wire & Cable : Back to the Basics


Below is a short list of Frequently Asked Questions about industrial wire & cable design and applications.

Q: How do you convert the alternating current voltage value (AC) of a cable into the corresponding direct current voltage value (DC)?

A: The rated voltage is specified in the form of an AC value (Alternating Current). In a DC system (Direct Current), the rated voltage of the system must not be greater than 1.5 times of the rated voltage of the cable.
To calculate the DC value, the relevant AC value is simply multiplied by a factor of 1.5, as in the examples below:

AC Alternating current          Factor                   DC Direct current
300/500 V                              x 1.5                      450/750 V
450/750 V                              x 1.5                      675/1125 V
600/1000 V                            x 1.5                      900/1500 V

The electrical voltage is measured in Volt (V).

Q: Can the steel wire armor also be used as EMC-compliant electromagnetic shielding resp. screening?

A: Although copper and steel are conductive metals, only copper (e.g. in the form of a braid) represents a suitable means of protecting a cable or wire from electromagnetic interference or shielding the environment from the interfering emissions originating from the cable itself. This not only depends on the electrical conductivity of the metal employed, but also on the braid density or the degree of coverage with which the cable is braided.
From all metals only pure silver offers marginally better conductive performance than copper. Although different qualities of iron/steel alloy exist, the conductivity of steel is generally six times lower than that of electrolyte copper. For this reason, a steel wire braid only ever protects a cable from external mechanical impact. To ensure optimized electromagnetic shielding, which also meets the requirements of the Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) directive, a sufficient level of copper braiding is required. As a minimum, a visual coverage level of 82-85% is required to achieve adequate screening protection. In the case of a steel wire braid used solely for mechanical protection, a visual coverage level of approx. 50% or less is standard. With a little practice, it is therefore quite easy to visually distinguish copper and steel wire braids by their degree of coverage. In addition, copper braids often have a slight reddish tinge (despite their tin plating), are somewhat softer than steel and are in comparison to steel non-magnetic.

However, even the densest, highest quality copper braid is rendered useless if it is not properly grounded! For safety reasons, steel wire braids should also be earthed when used in power networks. If the connected equipment develops a fault, this grounding prevents the transmission of dangerous voltages to the often exposed steel wire braid at the connecting points.

Q: Can a data cable with a peak operating voltage of 250 V be used to connect a device with a mains voltage of 230 V?

A: No! This could easily result in fires or lethal electric shocks! Data network cables and power cables are subject to completely different design and test standards. The main difference lies in the core insulation strength. Data cables are typically used in data networks with a voltage range of 6 to 48 V. Connection and control cables, on the other hand, are predominantly used for devices with a 230 V mains voltage (e.g. drills, lawnmowers etc.) or for machines in power or three-phase networks.

Since the size of the voltage is directly connected to the strength of the core insulation, this represents the greatest difference between data and power cables.

To be able to cope with voltage ranges of 300/500 V, the core insulation of power cable, for example, is on average 50-70% thicker than that of a data cable. It is possible for voltage peaks of 250 V to occur in data networks. However, under no circumstances must this voltage be equated with a stabilized alternating current of 230 V at 50 Hz supplied from a mains power socket! Using a data cable in this case would carry a very high risk of cable fires or electrocution resulting from the insufficient strength of the core insulation! The dielectric strength of data cables is generally only checked with 1200 to 1500 V for one minute periods. Connection and control cables, on the other hand, are tested with 4000 V for periods of 15 minutes.

Indirect connection of data cables to the power network is only possible if a transformer is used to convert the mains voltage to the permissible low voltage of the operated device (e.g. a laptop or model railway). In this case, it must be ensured that cable with the appropriate voltage class (e.g. 300/500 V) is used to connect the transformer to the mains supply and that the data cable is only used to link the relevant device with the transformer.

The electrical voltage is measured in Volt (V).


Q: Is it possible to load a cable or wire with a voltage class of 300/500 V with a higher voltage for a brief period, provided that the testing voltage value is not exceeded?

A: Heating systems, for example, require a relatively high voltage to ignite the pilot flame, but this is only needed once or twice a day and for a matter of milliseconds. Operators and users are often of the opinion that a cable with a rated voltage class of, for example, 300/500 V can be briefly supplied with a higher voltage, provided that it does not exceed the specified testing voltage. In such cases, it is very important to note that a cable with a rated voltage class of 300/500 V and a testing voltage of, for example, 4000 V must never be subjected a voltage exceeding the specified rated voltage – not even for a matter of milliseconds! Even if, for example, a voltage of 2500 V occurs just once per day for a single second, the relevant cable, and the core insulation thickness in particular, must be constructed and tested to ensure the appropriate rated voltage. In this particular case, a cable a with a rated voltage class of 1.8/3 kV must be used to safely handle the briefly occurring voltage of 2500 V.


Q: What is the difference between a copper braid screening and an aluminum laminated foil screening?

A: Copper braids primarily protect the cable against inductive coupling in the low frequency range in which virtually all connecting and control cables operate. If, for example, a data cable is installed in the direct vicinity of another connecting cable that may not have copper screen braiding, the data cable should be protected against inductive interference from the connection cable by means of a screening braid. The same applies if a connecting cable is installed in the proximity of an insufficiently shielded or EMC-compliant machine or in the vicinity of an electric motor, which can also generate fields of inductive interference.
Aluminum foils are primarily used in data cables, as data is generally transferred at very high frequencies, thus necessitating protection against capacitive coupling.
The so-called coupling resistance and the transfer impedance act as indicators of the shielding performance – the lower the measured transfer impedance, the greater the effectiveness of the cable screening.

Of course, the best results are achieved by combining a foil shield with copper screen braiding. The disadvantage is that the aluminum foil laminate makes the cable quite stiff and inflexible, meaning that it is mostly only really suitable for fixed installations in conventional cable construction design. Frequent movement of the cable can quickly tear or displace the sensitive foil shield, which will have a negative impact on screening performance.



Visit our website 

Like us on Facebook

Join our Linkedin Network